Monumental Christianity; or, The art and symbolism of the primitive church. CHAPTER IX - 5
Article Index
Monumental Christianity; or, The art and symbolism of the primitive church. CHAPTER IX
CHAPTER IX. JESUS CHRIST AS SUFFEREK.
2
3
4
5
All Pages

More than two centuries later, A. D. 530,
we have two representations at least, in
mosaic, of the Lamb slain from the founda-
tion of the world, in the midst of the seven
golden candlesticks, emblematic of His uni-
versal Church. One of these is reproduced
from Ciampini, in Fig. 109, except that one
candlestick is missing, on account of the
difficulty of representing it, hidden as it is
for the most part by the wing of an angel,
not here shown.

On each side of this altar stand two angels,
in the original picture; and the saints are
pressing forward from below with crowns in
their hands to cSst before the throne of


Monmnental Christianity.



the Lamb, saying, '* Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory, and honour, and
power; for Thou wast slain, and hast redeenried us to God," &c. (Rev. iv. and v.)*

There is no trace yet of the exaltation of the Virgin Mary, nor even of the
human form of our Lord ; it is all purely symbolical, and should have so remained
for the better preservation of pure doctrine.

In the first Vatican Basilica, during the Bishopric of Sylvester, A. D. 315-336,
Constantine was persuaded to erect a marble altar instead of the old wooden one,
and to decorate the Holy Place in which it stood with mosaics, afterwards restored
by Innocent III., representing our Lord alone on His heavenly throne, as a majes-




Fig. 109.— The Slain Lamb on the Altar. Mosaic. Sixth century.'^

tic figure of the usual ideal type, /. ^., with short, bifurcated beard, and long hair
parted in the middle, but now with a cruciform nimbus. Paul and Peter, His chief
apostles, are standing in their usual places ; two stately palm trees are on either
side ; the four streams of the first Paradise flow from the mount on which His
throne is fixed ; He holds the sealed book in one hand, and gives His blessing with
the other. Two stags come to drink of the living water. And directly underneath
this, we see the symbolical representation as given in Fig. no, with six sheep on
either side, coming from Bethlehem and Jerusalem ; while Innocent is on one side,
and a figure representing the Church of Rome, on the other. The whole is sur-
mounted by a gemmed cross. The chalice receives the Lamb's blood ; and from

' Ciampini, Vet.AIon. Pars. II. pi. 15 and 46.

* The original picture is too large to reproduce here, and I give simply the central object, or the Lamb,
with six can Uesticks.



Jesus Christ as Sufferer,



25^



His feet flow the streams of living
water. A nimbus is on His head, in-
dicative of holiness and divinity.'

The victorious Lamb with the
banner is never seen in ancient Chris-
tian monuments ; it was the invention
of mediaeval art. Down to the year
692, or thereabouts, the Lamb, as
shown in the above examples, was ex-
clusively used to symbolize Christ
as the Saviour, slain for the sins of
men, and triumphant over sin, Satan,
and death. At that time, we are told,
that the Church was uneasy lest the
reality and history of our Lord might
eventually be lost or swallowed up in
mere symbol and allegory. And so,
with a good intention, but with a most
painful realism, never ventured upon
before, the Council of Trullo, other-
wise known as the Quinqui-Sixtum, in
the reign of Justinian IL, ordained that
henceforth the actual historic figure
of the man Christ Jesus, should be
substituted in all Church paintings and mosaics for the symbolical lamb. Thus
runs the decree: '* In certain venerable pictures and images, the Precursor, St.
John, is represented pointing with his hand towards the Lamb of God. We
adopted this representation as a symbol of grace ; to our apprehension, it was the
shadow of that Lamb Christ, our God, whom the Law exhibited to us. Having,
then, in the first instance, accepted these figures and shadows as signs and emblems,
we now prefer to them grace and truth, /. e,, the fulfilment of the Law. Therefore,
in order to expose to all regards, perfection even in paintings, we determine that
for the future, in images of Christ, our God, He shall be represented in His human
form, instead of the Lamb, as in former times. We must contemplate all the sub-
limity of the Word through the veil of His humility. The painter must, as it
were, lead us by the hand to the remembrance of Jesus, living in the flesh, suffering

' Ciampini, Sacr. ^dificiis, pi. 13. Jac. Bosii. De Crux Trimp., pp. 615-16.




Fig. 110.— The LIfe-Giving Lamb. Mosaic. Fourth century.



252



Monumental Christianity.



and dying for our salvation,
and thus obtaining the redemp-
tion of the world." *

This action of the Eastern
Church was adopted by the
Western, when Adrian I., Bis-
hop of Rome, in the eighth
century, ordained this: "Be-
cause John the Baptist pointed
to Christ, saying, Behold the
Lamb of God ; therefore some
represented Christ under the
form of a Lamb ; but forasmuch
as the shadow hath passed
away, and because Christ is very
man, therefore He ought to be
represented in the form of a
man."'

And it was by such a pro-
cess of reasoning that the ven-
erable and sacred symbol of the
Lord's Supper at length became
the real Body and Blood of
Christ.

I have reproduced from
Bosio the painted crucifix which he discovered in the cemetery of Pope Julius, in
1594, and which is usually assigned to the time of Pope Adrian IIL, A. D. 884. (Fig.
III.) Bosio says that the form of our Lord is fastened to the cross with four nails,
whereas the feet show no marks of nails." Mary and John are the persons pres-
ent. It is curious to notice how the artist has represented the eclipse of the sun
and moon. The reader is requested to compare this Christian crucifix with that in
Chapter VIL, from Central India, and see the difference.

Of course there are older representations of the crucifixion than this, the old-
est, perhaps, being that of a Syriac manuscript of the Four Gospels, A. D. 586, in
which, according to Westwood, the crucifixion of Christ and the two thieves is rep-




Fi& xTiw— Crucifix.



Fresco. Ninth century.
Julius. '



From the Cemetery ot Tope



' Didron, Icon, Chrit., pp. 338-9.

^ Rom. Soit.t p. 581. Aringhi, II. p. 165.



* Durandus, RationaU, &c., I. c. 3. Didron, p. 336.



yesus Christ as Sufferer. 253

resented ; our Saviour being clothed in a long, loose shirt or tunic like the above ;
whereas the thieves have only a short garment across the middle of the body. On
either side of the cross of Christ stands a soldier with a spear and sponge, and at
its foot are seated three soldiers casting lots for His garments ; whilst on each side
of the picture stands a group of weeping disciples and females.' But this exist-
ence of the crucifix in manuscripts or other private and secluded places, is a vastly
different thing from their public positions in churches, chapels or oratories, where
the people were accustomed to meet for worship before them ; it is different, too, as
the work of monks for illustration of the Gospel history, from the decrees of
councils and popes respecting their use in the public worship of the churches, or in
private devotion. For it did not take a great many centuries to bring in the idolatry
of the crucifix itself— the adoration of the wood and the figure — and the superstitious
veneration of relics. Any one who has witnessed this kind of ceremonies at the
Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, or at Rome, knows the meaning of crucifix-worship.
And if the Church of the first six centuries could do without the crucifix, and
maintain its faith and charity in their purity, I, for one, can see no need of its in-
troduction and adoption now. It is and must always be, a most painful object to
look at, exciting only horror and anguish. The cross is quite enough to tell the
whole story of our redemption ; and of it we must never be ashamed.

I have reserved the annexed representation of a Pagan crucifix, as I believe it
is, for this place purposely, in order to show how the idea of the crucifixion of the
incarnate God may have been the common inheritance of Paganism ; and as an ob-
ject to excite the sensibilities, may have suggested to the churchmen of the sixth,
seventh, and eighth centuries, its adoption for this very purpose, as well as for
popular effect among the still remaining Pagans of the East and West. The
actual crucifixion of our Lord was the deed of Paganism ; and now, after
so long an interval, its representation might be ventured upon without shame
or risk. The Pagans would ridicule it no more, seeing that Christianity had
supplanted their own religion, and had realized the meaning of their own myth-
ology. The Crucified to them would mean life from the dead, and death in order
to life.

I have put on the next page (Figs. 1 12 and 1 13) one of the Round Towers of Ire-
land, upon which the representation of the crucifixion occurs, and four nondescript
bronze animals from India; the former copied from O'Brien, and the latter from
Moor." My only motive in doing so is to compare the animals having the long

' PaUogmphia Sacra Pictaria, art. Syriac Manuscripts. London, n. d. Fleury gives it as the first ; VEvan-
ffi^t II- pl- 87, with another of same date.

• Round Towers, pp. 299-304. Hindu Pantheon, pi. 34, No. 2, p. 141.



^54



Monumental Christianity,




Fig. 112.— Irish Round Tower and Crucifix.



long flexible nose like the ta-
pir, and had no need of a pro-
boscis ; such an animal once
roamed our Western plains
ot lived near their lakes, when
a tropical climate prevailed.
The horns are still in the
way, and we cannot identify



snouts. What are they? Not
elephants ; for there are no
tusks and no proboscis. Not
cows and calves, as Moor
suggests the lower ones to
be, by any stretch of the im-
agination ; for still there are
no horns, and the bodies are
those of elephants. The long
snout in all these examples
suggests the tapir, but there
are no tapirs in Ireland or
India; they are found thus
far only in South America
and Sumatra. They answer
better to the account of the
brontotherium, an animal so
named by Prof. Marsh, of
New Haven, Connecticut,
and discovered in the bed
of an old miocene lake, in
Dakota. Large as an ele-
phant, and bearing a general
resemblance to it in form, its
legs were shorter, and like
those of the rhinoceros; its
nose adorned with a pair of
huge horns ; its skull a yard
in length ; without tusks or
long proboscis, it still had a




Kic. 113 —Hindu Fi;*ures oi Animals.



Jesus Christ as Sufferer.



255



these animals in our plate with any existing species. But they are much alike; and
the question is, how did Ireland and India come so close together?

Henry O'Brien explains this Round Tower crucifixion as that of Buddha ; the
animals as the elephant and the bull sacred to Buddha, and into which his soul
entered after death ; the two figures standing beside the cross as Buddha's virgin
mother, and Kama, his favourite disciple.' The whole picture bears a close likeness
to the crucifixion in the cemetery of Pope Julius, except the animals, which are
conclusive proof that it cannot be Christian. It came ultimately from the far East
to Ireland with the Phoenician colonists,, who erected the Round Towers as sym-
bols of the Life-giving and Preserving Power of man and nature, and how that
universal life is produced through suffering and death.

Christ's crucifixion was shrouded in darkness ; but Christ's Church has been pre-
sumptuous enough to bring it forth into light and prominence, after the example
of Paganism, and to the perversion of its precious purpose. It was not to be seen,
or to be seen but once ; its realistic repetition destroys its awful sanctity and mys-
tery, and familiarizes the mind only with a ghastly scene of barbaric cruelty.

To what length human presumption will go
in this image of the Crucified, look for evidence
at this representation of God, the Father, hab-
ited as a Pope, and holding forth His Son in the
agony and death of crucifixion. (Fig. 1 14.) I
have copied it from Didron ; and it is to be
found among the curious representations of the
stained glass windows of St. Martin's Church,
Troyes, France.* It is the work of the latter
part of the sixteenth century.

But earlier than this, viz. : A. D. 15 11, Albert
Durer executed one of his most celebrated
paintings for a church in Nuremburg, whence it
was removed to Prague, and is now in the Bel-
vedere at Vienna, I mean his Adoration of the
Trinity, in which God the Father is represented
as Pope holding forth His crucified Son, as
above.* In view of all this, as to the symbol becoming an idol, the cry of the
Litany may well go up to heaven, day and night : O Lamb of God, who takest away
the sins of the world, have mercy upon us.




Fig. 114.— God the Father as Pope, and His
crucilied Son. Sixteenth century.



* Jiound Towers, p. 301, ' Jcon. Chr^i., p. 232. » \it2A\ Handbook of Painting, I. p. 134. London. 1854.



256 Monumental Christianity.

The earliest example of our Lord's burial which exists among the monuments
of primitive Christianity is, perhaps, that of an ivory in the Vatican, of the sixth
century, which represents a square structure, surmounted by a dome, with an open
door, no doubt intended for the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, with a sleeping
soldier on each side of it, and two of the holy women who came early in the morn-
ing to anoint the dead body of their Lord.* No such representations are found in
the Catacombs or the early churches either of the East or West. It is barely possi-
ble that on a sarcophagus of the fourth century, where two persons sit under the
Monogram, one asleep and the other looking up, there may be a symbolical allusion
to it ; but the actual scene has yet to be discovered.* So careful was early Christian
art in abstaining from all painful representations of her Lord. It is a hint to modern
realists in art that they go and do likewise. Mere animal and aesthetic sensibilities
do not constitute the essence of true religion, for it consists of faith, hope, and
charity ; faith comes from hearing the Word of God ; hope is the child of heaven
looking for future deliverance from all evil to the Cross of Christ alone; and charity
is the love of God and His truth, as well as of our neighbours, which also keeps
His commandments and endures forever.

> Fleury. LEvangiU, II. pi. 92, No. 3. * Id.. No. 2.

'^9ht[ial al$o $uffei|ed foi{ u$, leaving us an example.''

I. Fit.. iL ai.



yesus Christ as Deliverer. 257


 
eXTReMe Tracker
ñòàòèñòèêà